To effectively assess AI-generated drafts, we’ll need to be able to ask difficult questions, analyze evidence, consider counterarguments - in other words, to do the same important work we do when we write ourselves. Once we let the chatbot fill the blank page, the bot’s text will shape our understanding of the topic - with whatever limitations, biases and errors go with it. The panic over products from OpenAI and other companies says more about our cultural moment than about the tech itself. Opinion Opinion: An AI takeover is not inevitable - if we value creative work That may not matter if you’re writing an email to set up a meeting, but it will matter if you’re writing a business plan, a policy statement or a court case. If we turn to AI to do the writing, we’re not going to be doing the thinking either. Writing is hard because the process of getting something onto the page helps us figure out what we think - about a topic, a problem or an idea. Here’s the problem: In many cases, writing is the important work. These companies promise their AI assistants will boost our productivity, liberating us from the drudgery of writing so that we can use that time to do more important work. Microsoft’s Copilot promises to “jump-start the creative process so you never start with a blank slate again” by providing “a first draft to edit and iterate on - saving hours in writing, sourcing and editing time.” Grammarly promises that its “personalized generative AI co-creator” will help you “compose and ideate” so “you never have to experience alone.” Google’s “Help me write” is joining a crowded field of AI-powered writing assistants. It’s just knowledge sausageĪ common declaration about AI programs is that they’re learning abilities they weren’t trained to have.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |